San Diego St.
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
588  Elaine Ribeiro JR 21:02
920  Grace Hanshaw JR 21:29
1,012  Cassidy Towner SO 21:35
1,183  Rachel Roesgen SR 21:48
1,336  Lily Seynaeve SO 21:58
1,799  Cali King JR 22:29
2,166  Hannah Sawatzki SR 22:55
2,356  Lily Best-Mayko SO 23:11
National Rank #170 of 339
West Region Rank #25 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 23.3%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Elaine Ribeiro Grace Hanshaw Cassidy Towner Rachel Roesgen Lily Seynaeve Cali King Hannah Sawatzki Lily Best-Mayko
UNLV Invitational 10/03 1189 21:02 21:31 21:25 21:50 21:40 22:29 22:50 23:20
UCR - Highlander Invitational 10/17 1224 21:05 22:04 21:43 22:26 22:31 23:06
Mountain West Championships 10/30 1236 21:21 21:13 22:46 22:32 22:39 23:13
West Region Championships 11/13 1211 21:13 21:35 21:53 21:23 22:34 23:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.9 656 0.1 0.1 0.7 2.0 4.4 6.5 9.6 11.0 11.7 11.3 11.8 10.2 8.3 6.5 3.2 1.7 0.7 0.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elaine Ribeiro 84.0
Grace Hanshaw 120.9
Cassidy Towner 131.0
Rachel Roesgen 150.7
Lily Seynaeve 166.6
Cali King 208.4
Hannah Sawatzki 234.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.7% 0.7 16
17 2.0% 2.0 17
18 4.4% 4.4 18
19 6.5% 6.5 19
20 9.6% 9.6 20
21 11.0% 11.0 21
22 11.7% 11.7 22
23 11.3% 11.3 23
24 11.8% 11.8 24
25 10.2% 10.2 25
26 8.3% 8.3 26
27 6.5% 6.5 27
28 3.2% 3.2 28
29 1.7% 1.7 29
30 0.7% 0.7 30
31 0.3% 0.3 31
32 0.1% 0.1 32
33 0.0% 0.0 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0